Re: free s/wan (really interoperability)

From: R. DuFresne (dufresneat_private)
Date: Tue Oct 05 1999 - 11:23:39 PDT

  • Next message: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: free s/wan (really interoperability)"

    On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
    
    > Ron DuFresne had asked:
    > > Are there any VPN products that do not require the same setup on both ends
    > > to impliment?  (i.e. VPN products that are cross-compatible with other
    > > products out there)
    > 
    > There is IPsec VPN server software out there that is sold without a
    > client - one is directed to several other companies that make IPsec
    > clients.  So it would seem that the answer, probably with some caveats,
    > is, "yes."
    > 
    > If you consider 'ssh' tunnels to be VPNs [you can do PPP through them],
    > then there are also multiple implementations of 'ssh' and 'sshd'.
    > 
    
    
    Okay, I can see the point here with sshd and the various ssh
    implementations.  But, I'm more looking at this from a slightly different
    perspective.  free s/wan as I understand it requires another free s/wan
    box on the otherside of the connection.  I'm trusting the same is the case
    with cisco's VPN solution<s> and most likely with FW1's implementation, as
    well as many of the other offerings.  Are any as flexible or nearly as
    flexible in interoperability as the ssh/sshd implementations mentioned
    thus far?
    
    
    Thanks,
    
    Ron DuFresne
    -- 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            admin & senior consultant:  darkstar.sysinfo.com
                      http://darkstar.sysinfo.com
    
    "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
    eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
    business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation."
                    -- Johnny Hart
    
    testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:42:19 PDT