Re: Open ports on FW1

From: Jayson Broughton (jbroughtonat_private)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2000 - 11:38:45 PST

  • Next message: daN.: "Re: Sizing a firewall"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    Simon,
    The following ports are used by Firewall-1, I believe that all of
    these ports should remain open, unless one thinks that it would
    provide a means in breaching security.
    *TCP 259 is used for Client Authentication, the UDP port of 259 is
    used as encryption to manage an encrypted session.
    *TCP 258 is used for the Firewall administration GUI via remote
    administration. aka FWpolicy Remote GUI.
    * TCP 257 is used for the Remote Firewall program(module?) to send
    logs to a Manager console.
    * port 256 is used too for encryption, that of CS & DH key exchange
    in the FWZ encryption.  Some say this is also used by
    securemote.  I have no recollection of this, but someone out in the
    audience might be able to help you there
    *UDP 161 & 260 used by Firewall-1's SNMP Daemon.
    
    Once again, if your job/ability, is useful for remotely administering
    the firewall, then I would keep all of these active.  I believe
    that Checkpoint wants these ports open at all times.  But once again,
    a speculation.
        One last thing, if you do use remote administration of your
    firewall, be smart and use a Randomly generated, or Really
    bloomin' hard to guess password with random #'s and Characters.
    There are crackers out there that can rip through weak
    passwords like a knife through butter.
    
    
    Jayson Broughton
    HQ-All Bases Covered
    Network & Security Admin.
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
    
    iQA/AwUBOITBEKe75Wq9veF/EQLi0gCg199VWfkcTxuiSg1YnAM7CLubbrEAnAvG
    cTj7xEy3MyeYu0rJ7Vueoa/V
    =88ED
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
    
    
    Simon Elliot wrote:
    
    > Hi
    >
    > I was interested in a previous messge you received
    > regarding TCP ports 256,257,258 on Firewall 1.
    > What security implication can rise from these ports being open?
    >
    > Thanks for your time
    > Any help will be gratefully received.
    >
    > ______________________________________________________
    > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:58:19 PDT