Re: Does anyone recognize this?

From: Ryan Russell (ryanat_private)
Date: Tue Apr 17 2001 - 18:27:22 PDT

Next message: Daniel Brachmann: "Re: Madereet exploit"

Previous message: Alfred Huger: "Carko"
Next in thread: Bill Borton: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
Reply: Bill Borton: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Crist Clark wrote:

> > Why the strange port numbers if it was FTP?
>
> Uh... 'cause FTP is a fscked up protocol? I guess you are expecting to
> see port 20? Not if you're doing PASV.

Port 20 and/or not port 60151.  The only client I'm used to on the Linux
side that does PASV by default is ncftp, and I'm not used to seeing 60151
being allocated by most OSes, unless there is a NAT device in-between,
which shouldn't be the case if the machine using 60151 is the FTP server.

					Ryan

Next message: Daniel Brachmann: "Re: Madereet exploit"
Previous message: Alfred Huger: "Carko"
Next in thread: Bill Borton: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
Reply: Bill Borton: "Re: Does anyone recognize this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 17 2001 - 20:08:18 PDT