Re: Increase in Sub7 scans

From: Adam Stanley (adamat_private)
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 09:44:57 PDT

  • Next message: Daniel Martin: "Re: Increase in Sub7 scans"

    I received an email this morning from a concerned gentleman detailing a
    new Sub7 worm that was being released on IRC.  It was in response to the
    Mcveigh execution and was being distributed on the EFNet IRC network in
    channel #mcveigh.  An account on one of my machines was oped in the
    channel at the time and as a result I received the report.  I will
    forward the email on to the list following this post.
    
    -Adam
    
    --
    Adam Stanley
    CTO / VP
    Nethosters, Inc.
    
    On 12 Jun 2001 08:42:58 -0500, Obert, Jack E. wrote:
    > Since February, I've been receiving tcp port scans for the default sub7 port
    > (27374) at a rate of approximately 3-4 per day.  Starting on June 8th to
    > present, I've been receiving them at 9 times that rate.  
    > 
    > 6/5/01 - 3 Scans
    > 6/6/01 - 4 Scans
    > 6/7/01 - 3 Scans
    > 6/8/01 - 8 Scans
    > 6/9/01 - 14 Scans
    > 6/10/01 - 38 Scans
    > 6/11/01 - 22 Scans
    > 
    > Any ideas on what could have sparked this increased scanning?  A new
    > utility?  A new vulnerability related to sub7?  New media publicity?
    > 
    > Thanks
    > 
    > Jack E. Obert, GSEC 
    > Technical Information Security Officer 
    > St. John's Health System 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 12 2001 - 09:38:16 PDT