Re: Increase in Sub7 scans

From: sarnoldat_private
Date: Tue Jun 12 2001 - 09:10:27 PDT

Next message: Kip Perkins: "Possible Intrusion?"

Previous message: Daniel Martin: "Re: Increase in Sub7 scans"
In reply to: gene.g.beairdat_private: "RE: Increase in Sub7 scans"
Next in thread: David Endler: "RE: Increase in Sub7 scans"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:26:58AM -0500, gene.g.beairdat_private wrote:
> School's out!  :-(

Eh? Is this the collective experience of others? I would have thought
the exact opposite, what with high-bandwidth connections at most schools
but not at home.

Respond to me privately, I'll summarize.

[...]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JObert [mailto:JObertat_private]
[...]
> Since February, I've been receiving tcp port scans for the default sub7 
> port
> (27374) at a rate of approximately 3-4 per day.  Starting on June 8th to
> present, I've been receiving them at 9 times that rate.

Next message: Kip Perkins: "Possible Intrusion?"
Previous message: Daniel Martin: "Re: Increase in Sub7 scans"
In reply to: gene.g.beairdat_private: "RE: Increase in Sub7 scans"
Next in thread: David Endler: "RE: Increase in Sub7 scans"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 12 2001 - 10:00:16 PDT