RE: Port 113 requests?

From: Andrew Leonard (andyat_private)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 15:58:21 PST

  • Next message: Crist J . Clark: "Re: Port 113 requests?"

    Quoting "Slighter, Tim" <tslighterat_private>:
    
    > you really should try and specify that the rule "drops" instead of
    > reject so
    > that the potential intruder is not provided with any information about
    > their
    > attempted connection.
    
    In this case (SMTP AUTH), if you drop instead of reject, you will have to wait
    for the remote server to time out its auth connection before it lets you get on
    with SMTP.  This can slow mail delivery down substantially.
    
    cheers:
    andy
    --
    Andrew Leonard
    Geospiza, Inc.
    3939 Leary Way NW
    Seattle, WA 98107
    (206) 633-4403; (206) 633-4415 (fax)
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
    For more information on this free incident handling, management 
    and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 09:54:09 PST