Re: Port 113 requests?

From: Alexander Bochmann (securityfocus-incidentsat_private)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 02:42:35 PST

Next message: Jose Nazario: "RE: Port 113 requests?"

Previous message: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Port 113 requests?"
In reply to: Slighter, Tim: "RE: Port 113 requests?"
Next in thread: Patrick Patterson: "Re: Port 113 requests?"
Next in thread: Chris Keladis: "RE: Port 113 requests?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

...on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:51:33PM -0700, Slighter, Tim wrote:

 > you really should try and specify that the rule "drops" instead of reject so
 > that the potential intruder is not provided with any information about their
 > attempted connection.

...except that Ryan Russell just explained why this is a 
bad idea (at least if you want to send mail from that machine).

Alex.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com

Next message: Jose Nazario: "RE: Port 113 requests?"
Previous message: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Port 113 requests?"
In reply to: Slighter, Tim: "RE: Port 113 requests?"
Next in thread: Patrick Patterson: "Re: Port 113 requests?"
Next in thread: Chris Keladis: "RE: Port 113 requests?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 13:52:52 PST