Yes, the default install of Redhat 6.2 had the VERY VERY vulnerable version of wu-ftpd installed along with the vulnerable version of BIND if I recall correctly. Redhat 6.2 installs with out patches, etc. won't last very long on the internet :). > Does anyone know if > Redhat 6.2 default install contained a vulnerable wu_ftpd? > Unfortunately the machine was rebuilt before I could check the > version of wu_ftpd. I went ahead and checked my exploits for it and > wonder if anyone here had any default wuftpd installs of redhat 6.2 > hit? If anyone has responded to a similar machine, please let me > know! > > Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 06 2002 - 15:50:38 PST