RE: Odd scan

From: McCammon, Keith (Keith.McCammonat_private)
Date: Sun Jul 21 2002 - 17:38:01 PDT

  • Next message: Russell Fulton: "Re: Odd scan"

    You might want to try searching the GIAC archives, as well as Google.  I found these right off the bat:
    
    http://komura.net/snort/210/196/70/dest210.196.70.123-301.html
    http://komura.net/snort/210/196/70/dest210.196.70.122-201.html
    
    Same pattern.  I don't know of any tool with this fingerprint, but there are a lot of similar portscan logs floating around...
    
    Cheers
    
    Keith
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Tadas Miniotas [mailto:tadasat_private]
    > Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 1:04 PM
    > To: incidentsat_private
    > Subject: Odd scan
    > 
    > 
    > Hello,
    > 
    > Just some snort logs I found interesting. Time is GMT+2, and 
    > the source 
    > IP comes from Malaysia.
    > 
    > Earliest: 15:43:39 on 7/20/2002
    > Latest: 16:16:45 on 7/20/2002
    >      * 584 instances of TCP ******S* scan
    > Jul 20 15:43:39 202.151.224.13:2029 -> xxx.xxx.32.15:79 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:39 202.151.224.13:2030 -> xxx.xxx.32.15:161 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:39 202.151.224.13:2031 -> xxx.xxx.32.15:1524 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:40 202.151.224.13:2024 -> xxx.xxx.32.13:161 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:40 202.151.224.13:2025 -> xxx.xxx.32.13:1524 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:42 202.151.224.13:2032 -> xxx.xxx.32.62:79 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:42 202.151.224.13:2034 -> xxx.xxx.32.62:1524 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:42 202.151.224.13:2035 -> xxx.xxx.32.69:79 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:42 202.151.224.13:2036 -> xxx.xxx.32.69:161 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:42 202.151.224.13:2037 -> xxx.xxx.32.69:1524 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:43 202.151.224.13:2033 -> xxx.xxx.32.62:161 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:43 202.151.224.13:2032 -> xxx.xxx.32.62:79 SYN ******S*
    > Jul 20 15:43:43 202.151.224.13:2034 -> xxx.xxx.32.62:1524 SYN ******S*
    > <snip>
    > 
    > What seems odd to me is quite unusual set of ports for a 
    > scan. Quite a 
    > few vulnerabilities have been discovered in SNMP (port 161), an 
    > ingreslock service (port 1524) is reported to be used as an backdoor 
    > for several exploits against RPC services, finger is a rarely used 
    > service these days. So far, so good, but I fail to see what 
    > these three 
    > ports have in common. Has anyone seen something similar? Any insight 
    > would be greatly appreciated.
    > 
    > Best regards,
    > --
    > Tadas Miniotas
    > LitNET NOC
    > 
    > --------------------------------------------------------------
    > --------------
    > This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
    > For more information on this free incident handling, management 
    > and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
    > 
    > 
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
    For more information on this free incident handling, management 
    and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 22 2002 - 08:32:28 PDT