Re: Scans from proxyprotector.com

From: Jeff (spam-fighterat_private)
Date: Sat May 17 2003 - 15:12:59 PDT

  • Next message: John McCracken: "RE: A question for the list..."

    "Justin Coffi" <jcoffiat_private> posted to incidentsat_private on
    Sat, 17 May 2003 at 10:35:08 -0700:
    > What information supplied by google suggested that?
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: George Theall [mailto:theallat_private]
    > Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 9:49 AM
    > To: incidentsat_private
    > Subject: Re: Scans from proxyprotector.com
    8<
    > Googling news for proxyprotector as well as 64.201.104.2 (the host they
    > seem to scan from) suggests they're black hats.
    8<
    
    The article at
    http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=slrnbbf3m8.1djf.andrew%2Bnonews%40trinity.supernews.net
    posted by Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonewsat_private> to
    news.admin.net-abuse.email on Tue, 06 May 2003 at 10:30:32 -0000 states "my
    guess is that they are black-hat."
    
    Best Regards,  Jeff.
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
    Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies 
    that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. 
    Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.
    
    To get your FREE white paper visit us at:    
    http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 17 2003 - 15:15:02 PDT