Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt?

From: Jeff (spam-fighterat_private)
Date: Thu May 29 2003 - 07:10:31 PDT

Next message: Rob Shein: "RE: A question for the list..."

Previous message: Jeff: "Re: A question for the list..."
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Keith Owens" <kaosat_private> posted to incidentsat_private on
Wed, 28 May 2003 at 13:33:08 +1000:

> www.mortgagelowrates.net (210.51.181.1) is a persistent spammer.
> Repeated complaints to tech-group@china-netcom.com and
> anti-spamat_private have been ignored.  Given the amount of
> spam advertising 210.51.0.0/16 and the lack of response from
> tech-group@china-netcom.com, it is fairly obvious that all of
> 210.51.0.0/16 should be null routed.

I have also gotten many spams since September 2001 implicating that block
and/or other china-netcom.com blocks, including source, web, and email
servers.

According to http://spamcop.net/sc?track=http%3A%2F%2F210.51.181.1%2F ,
"tech-group@china-netcom.com bounces (100 sent : 64503 bounces)" and the
following should be used as "Reporting addresses:
cnc-abuseat_private
zhaomq@china-netcom.com
postmaster@china-netcom.com".

I would also complain to spamat_private and dannyat_private .


Best Regards, Jeff.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Rob Shein: "RE: A question for the list..."
Previous message: Jeff: "Re: A question for the list..."
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 29 2003 - 08:11:29 PDT