Re: Scan of TCP 552-554

From: Dave Paris (dparisat_private)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 19:02:35 PDT

  • Next message: Neatherly, William: "RE: WORM_MIMAIL.A Anyone have any info on what this does yet?"

    I believe my original reply still stands.  If you're looking for 
    empathy or sympathy, I'm sure you'll find many commiseration partners 
    here.  If you're looking to alter the reality of routing and/or 
    physics, you'll probably have a tougher go of it.
    
    -dsp
    
    On Friday, Aug 1, 2003, at 20:10 US/Eastern, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
    
    > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:31:26PM -0400, Dave Paris wrote:
    >> Not to point out the wholly obvious or anything, but...
    >>
    >> Regardless of your response to the portscan, by the time you react it 
    >> has
    >> already "used your link" and cost you bandwidth.
    >
    > You are MOSTLY correct. But I have had cases where someone kept
    > portscanning me for almost a week.
    >
    > -- 
    > Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigobat_private>
    > "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
    >
    > <mime-attachment>
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Aug 03 2003 - 08:46:00 PDT