I don't mean configure my module. I mean, things like: aud_get_id(); or inf_set_file(); etc., which in a kernel patch would be system calls. Cheers Andrew David Wagner wrote: > > Andrew Morgan wrote: > >As a simple example, "I need to add the following > >system calls to manipulate my foo-bar security hook" > > No, a better way to do this in Linux is probably to use the /proc/ > filesystem to configure your module. There is absolutely no need > to add a new system call to configure your model, and I think it is > a really bad idea. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-security-module mailing list > linux-security-moduleat_private > http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 16:56:41 PDT