Re: A Comment from User Space

From: jmjonesat_private
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 15:41:46 PDT

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: A Comment from User Space"

    On 21 Apr 2001, David Wagner wrote:
    
    > Once again, I propose the following: If you want to build a policy
    > module that adds extra semantics to access(), feel free -- but I would
    > like to be free to build a policy module that ignores access() [or even
    > kills any process that uses it, if I wish].
    
    
    Agreed, but it's gonna break stuff (but not irreparably),
    J. Melvin Jones
    
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
    ||  Software Developer
    ||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
    ||  Network and Systems Administration
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  http://www.jmjones.com/
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Apr 21 2001 - 15:47:43 PDT