On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:10:22PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Greg KH Wrote: > > > Remember the LSM lives in kernel space along > > with the rest of the kernel, so it can touch any part of kernel memory > > that it wants to, even if we "hide" it. Also any thing that implements > > this would cause the way to call the hooks to slow down. > > Quite repectfully, isn't that in the domain of the module, not the > interface? If the module adds value to the point the slow-down is > worthwhile, why not let it? I the module causes things to slow down that's fine. I don't want to impose artificial burdens on the interface that everyone has to accept. Attempting to hide the interface structure from the module would be such a burden (both in complexity and speed) and not be useful at all (can not work.) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 22 2001 - 13:38:12 PDT