On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 04:29:20PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Of course, it's no use specifying something that cannot be coded or that is > > going to be hopelessly inefficient. So we are probably looking at some form > > of iterative process. > > Agreed, if an "interative process" means we USERS will get feedback that > will result in modification of the interface. Hm, the only "users" of this is other programmers. Namely the people who write security modules. No end-user will _ever_ care about this interface (when was the last time a end-user cared about how the interface to the VFS worked?) greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 22 2001 - 16:35:13 PDT