Crispin Cowan <crispinat_private>: > > jmjonesat_private wrote: > > > > Perhaps we could get some webspace with the patches up? This would be > > > very useful for me, and I wonder if it would be for anyone else? If > > > this was done, I think more people might take a look at the code, and we > > > all know what happens when more eyes look at code! :-) > > > > Yes, YESS OH GOD YES! > > > > I don't know the protocol, but i'll volunteer space and an IP!!! > > Web space is definitely something we were planning on doing some time soon. > What kind of source control do folks think is appropriate? Tar balls? CVS? > We've been playing with Bitkeeper lately, and kinda like it. I suggest a combination - a source control system to track intermediate updates, but a tarball snapshot for a final checkpoint where it "should" be functional (or at least can be compiled). A source control system is only usefull if all updates are consistant and everyone can retrieve from it. I've found that a tarball snapshot usually is more consistant and easier to report problems about. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollardat_private Any opinions expressed are solely my own. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 05:37:46 PDT