On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:34:17PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > True, but running documentation tandem to development has the following > advantages: Your comments imply that the documentation be done by the coders themselves in order to get the benefits during implementation. I propose simply using the current kernel-doc system, in documenting the security.h file. Works well, exports to a zillion different formats, and can be kept up to date with the code very easily (it is in the code.) I'd gladly take a patch that does this right now. I think that a small effort of implementing this now, is better than having people spend separate efforts of keeping the documentation (which lives outside of the source tree) up to date with the source. Unless you enjoy doing these kinds of things :) Good luck, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 01 2001 - 15:56:47 PDT