Re: LSM Benchmark Results - lsm-2001_05_04-2.4.4.patch

Previous message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: LSM Benchmark Results - lsm-2001_05_04-2.4.4.patch"
In reply to: jmjonesat_private: "Re: LSM Benchmark Results - lsm-2001_05_04-2.4.4.patch"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: LSM Benchmark Results - lsm-2001_05_04-2.4.4.patch"
Reply: jmjonesat_private: "Re: LSM Benchmark Results - lsm-2001_05_04-2.4.4.patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:36:16PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
> No, wouldn't boot on either system that way.  Since, um, I haven't got a
> module to load yet.

Hm, did you select the "Capabilities Support" option as "M"?  That
should build capability_plug.o in the modules tree.  Install that after
the system has booted, to get relatively the same code paths as the
"stock" 2.4.4 kernel has.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module