Re: More 2.4.4 benchmarks

Previous message: Greg KH: "More 2.4.4 benchmarks"
In reply to: Greg KH: "More 2.4.4 benchmarks"
Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: More 2.4.4 benchmarks"
Reply: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: More 2.4.4 benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

crispinat_private

Greg KH wrote:

> Attached is the result of running lmbench 2beta3 on a 4 proc 700Mhz Xeon
> with 1Gb ram.  4 runs with a stock 2.4.4 kernel, and 4 runs with the
> latest lsm patch with the capability_plug module running.
>
> Read into the numbers what you will :)

For the most part, they show very little degradation due to LSM.  Good.

The curious metric is main memory latency:  it shows considerable degradation,
when this is one metric I would expect to be unaffected by LSM.  I don't have a
decent conjecture of what would cause this.

Crispin

--
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com
Security Hardened Linux Distribution:       http://immunix.org

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module