Re: More 2.4.4 benchmarks

From: Crispin Cowan (crispinat_private)
Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 00:33:49 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Sample SELinux hook function implementations"

    Greg KH wrote:
    > Attached is the result of running lmbench 2beta3 on a 4 proc 700Mhz Xeon
    > with 1Gb ram.  4 runs with a stock 2.4.4 kernel, and 4 runs with the
    > latest lsm patch with the capability_plug module running.
    > Read into the numbers what you will :)
    For the most part, they show very little degradation due to LSM.  Good.
    The curious metric is main memory latency:  it shows considerable degradation,
    when this is one metric I would expect to be unaffected by LSM.  I don't have a
    decent conjecture of what would cause this.
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
    Security Hardened Linux Distribution:
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 09 2001 - 00:35:24 PDT