Valdis.Kletnieksat_private wrote: > On Wed, 09 May 2001 00:33:49 PDT, Crispin Cowan said: > > For the most part, they show very little degradation due to LSM. Good. > > > The curious metric is main memory latency: it shows considerable degradation, > > when this is one metric I would expect to be unaffected by LSM. I don't have a > > decent conjecture of what would cause this. > > OK.. Speculating on the *weird* causes first. ;) Yup, cache pathologies are a likely candidate to cause this. > Time to go can-opener the lmbench code and start looking, I guess.... Or just ignore it for now, and see if the artifact goes away or reverses itself. Chasing cache artifacts can be a very expensive hobby :-) Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 09 2001 - 10:52:32 PDT