Re: Extending a Security Module

Previous message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Extending a Security Module"
In reply to: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Extending a Security Module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:24:48PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
> 
> Yes it does.  If the kernel calls the registered function, it's that 
> FUNCTIONS responsibility to chain, if desired.

Ok, I agree.  This is the way that I was thinking that modules could
chain other modules.  It is up to the module to do the chaining if they
want to.  I misunderstood what you were trying to say, sorry.

Now to go look for that change to the capabilities module to get the
right symbol exported to work properly...

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module