Re: Extending a Security Module

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 14:16:30 PDT

  • Next message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Extending a Security Module"

    On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:24:48PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
    > Yes it does.  If the kernel calls the registered function, it's that 
    > FUNCTIONS responsibility to chain, if desired.
    Ok, I agree.  This is the way that I was thinking that modules could
    chain other modules.  It is up to the module to do the chaining if they
    want to.  I misunderstood what you were trying to say, sorry.
    Now to go look for that change to the capabilities module to get the
    right symbol exported to work properly...
    greg k-h
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 22 2001 - 15:18:23 PDT