* Titus D. Winters (titusat_private) wrote: > So Chris Lundberg and I are in the process of porting over a honeypot that > I wrote as an LKM a while back. Since we are hiding files and processes, > we are finding that returning EPERM in places (like ptrace, open, and > several others) is less useful than returning something like ESRCH or > ENOENT. Aside from the 1 assignment per query performance hit, why are we > not doing something like This sounds good, some other people have asked for this. Patches are gratefully accepted. You may want to either hold off for a couple hours until the latest BitKeeper is available, or make your patch relative to the patch that Greg posted on the 27th (which merges with 2.4.5). -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 30 2001 - 11:53:26 PDT