Re: module's use of security_ops

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: module's use of security_ops"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: module's use of security_ops"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: module's use of security_ops"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: module's use of security_ops"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:41:40PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> fs/binfmt_elf.c
> 
> if (!bprm->sh_bang) {
>     retval = security_ops->file_ops->permission (bprm->file, MAY_EXEC);

Doh, wasn't thinking about the current modules.  There are lots of other
places that will also need access (see all of the current capable()
checks in drivers that can be compiled as a module.)

I agree, it will need to be exported.

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module