* Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote: > > Since people seem to prefer purely restrictive hooks (and these are > sufficient for SELinux), I've changed the authoritative hooks > in our LSM patch to be purely restrictive. I also integrated > some unrelated changes from the WireX tree and merged > with 2.4.6-pre3. I've attached an up-to-date diff between > the WireX tree and our tree. As before, I've left the > capabilities code untouched until there is a consensus > on the right approach for migrating it to a module. excellent! i'm interested in merging this patch into bitkeeper. stephen has generated a 2.4.5 patch for me, that we'd like to push into the repository so we can post a new 2.4.5 lsm patch. then we'll redo the 2.4.6-pre merging. this will keep the lsm patches based on stable kernel releases, and allow the bitkeeper tree to track the -pre releases. consider this a last chance to speak up with serious objections (and solutions including code). otherwise this will go into the repository tomorrow and we work forward from stephen's proposal. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jun 18 2001 - 18:06:39 PDT