On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:05:20PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > WE're developing a publicly accessable MPI, I'M developing a > proprietary, commercial LSM/patch+device, as well as a GPL'd version > designed as "community repayment." ... the needs (legally) are different. > Technologically, the needs are similar. So do what WireX does. Use BitKeeper for the LSM tree. Use cvs or whatever for your closed source module. Keep the two in separate directories (your closed source module can't ship as a patch, so you might as well get used to building it outside of the kernel tree right now :) greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 19 2001 - 21:05:25 PDT