On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:02:23PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > The threat model under consideration is kernel developers who either > optimize away a hook they don't understand, or add some new functionality > (e.g. a new way to open files) without adding appropriate hooks. Following > some discussion, we concluded that there is no cure for this threat except > dilligence. Does this mean the consensus reached at the BoF was that a regression test program wouldn't be worth the time it takes to write one? I tend to think asking Linus and Alan to run './lsm-nothing-obviously-broken-tester' before making new point releases would be a useful thing. But if you guys hashed it all out, I'm fine going with your decision. :) _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 03 2001 - 14:48:20 PDT