Re: Kernel Security Extensions USENIX BOF Summary

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2001 - 08:36:45 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: attach_pathlabel"

    * jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote:
    > On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > 
    > > sarnoldat_private wrote:
    > > 
    > > > Yeah, it probably isn't going to be as much fun as writing the modules
    > > > that we all want to write, but .. hopefully such a tool would make
    > > > debugging things easier for everyone.
    > > >
    > > > I *did* get it correct, right?
    > > 
    > > Yes, Seth got it right.  The proposal was for a regression test program and
    > > regression test module.  The purpose is to test whether all the appropriate
    > > hooks are in all the appropriate places in the mainline kernel, so that any
    > > module has the opportunity to respond appropriately.
    > 
    > Isn't that what Chris is for? (^_^)
    > 
    
    heh ;-)  that is what this list/project is for.  commiting code changes
    does mean a healthy dose of testing, and watching out for lonely lost
    hooks.  any additional testing tools would be helpful.
    
    -chris
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 05 2001 - 08:37:17 PDT