* jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Crispin Cowan wrote: > > > sarnoldat_private wrote: > > > > > Yeah, it probably isn't going to be as much fun as writing the modules > > > that we all want to write, but .. hopefully such a tool would make > > > debugging things easier for everyone. > > > > > > I *did* get it correct, right? > > > > Yes, Seth got it right. The proposal was for a regression test program and > > regression test module. The purpose is to test whether all the appropriate > > hooks are in all the appropriate places in the mainline kernel, so that any > > module has the opportunity to respond appropriately. > > Isn't that what Chris is for? (^_^) > heh ;-) that is what this list/project is for. commiting code changes does mean a healthy dose of testing, and watching out for lonely lost hooks. any additional testing tools would be helpful. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 05 2001 - 08:37:17 PDT