-----Original Message----- From: crispinat_private [mailto:crispinat_private] > IMHO, the priority sequence for LSM is: > 1. Finish the current rendition of LSM and get it into the 2.5 kernel (as > Greg said) > 2. Audit > 3. Permissive hooks Does your humble opinion represent, by any chance, something that can be viewed as a guideline? If you are saying that permissive hooks are low priority, but that they _are_ a recognized goal of the project, then I think I agree; there may be no need to get them in now, but perhaps something _could_ be put in at relatively low cost so as to indicate more clearly that this is a direction in which we think we might want to go. Even just a very low priority entry on the TODO list would be a great start. > In any case, I feel much more strongly that "finish stage 1" is high priority > than I do about disputing which of audit or permissiveness is more important. > So lets go finish stage 1, and then worry about the other stuff. "I'd love to help, but I'm not much use at anything but a supervisory position. You boys just keep working on that fence, and I'll sit back over here and critique. You know, only the BEST white-washers get to paint that fence." Is there a clear list of projects on which help is needed? -- Matt _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 13 2001 - 16:24:23 PDT