Re: Making forward progress

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Fri Aug 03 2001 - 09:40:46 PDT

  • Next message: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: Making forward progress"

    On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:25:40 EDT, Stephen Smalley said:
    
    > NFSv4 seems clearly out of scope for LSM.  
    
    Umm... "clearly"?
    
    Are you prepared to tell the customers down the road "You can use NFSv4,
    or you can use LSM, but you can't get LSM support for securing NFSv4 because
    the LSM folks thought NFSv4 was clearly out of scope?"
    
    If NFSv4 is *clearly* out of scope, I'll propose that the networking hooks
    are out of scope too.  After all, anybody who cares about security doesn't
    hook their boxes up to the wire, right? ;)
    -- 
    				Valdis Kletnieks
    				Operating Systems Analyst
    				Virginia Tech
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 03 2001 - 09:41:36 PDT