On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 03:11:43AM +0000, David Wagner wrote: > Was this meant seriously? Absolutely. One will be faster than the other, usually. > I'm convinced this can't be the argument you had in mind for moving > all existing kernel checks to a module. I must be missing something. > I hope you'll show me where I went wrong. Ah, I didn't keep enough context from previous posts to know that this was the reason behind the thread. I was just responding to the question you had asked about the speed differences between the two forms. No, I am not a fan of moving the current kernel checks out of the kernel, even if it may be able to save some group one or two cycles every now and then. :) -- I really must learn to pay more attention to the context of my comments... _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 03 2001 - 10:51:29 PDT