Re: Problems with some of the current hooks

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Problems with some of the current hooks"
Maybe in reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Problems with some of the current hooks"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Problems with some of the current hooks"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Problems with some of the current hooks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

Here's Serge's proposed patch to fix the post_lookup code.

Does anyone have any objections to me applying it?

thanks,

greg k-h

--- fs/namei.c.old	Sat Aug  4 18:13:10 2001
+++ fs/namei.c	Sat Aug  4 16:42:19 2001
@@ -735,23 +735,24 @@
 
 	dentry = cached_lookup(base, name, 0);
 	if (!dentry) {
 		struct dentry *new = d_alloc(base, name);
 		dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 		if (!new)
 			goto out;
 		lock_kernel();
 		dentry = inode->i_op->lookup(inode, new);
 		unlock_kernel();
-		if (!dentry)
+		if (!dentry) {
 			dentry = new;
-		else
+			security_ops->inode_ops->post_lookup(inode, dentry);
+		} else
 			dput(new);
 	}
 out:
 	return dentry;
 }
 
 /* SMP-safe */
 struct dentry * lookup_one_len(const char * name, struct dentry * base, int len)
 {
 	unsigned long hash;



_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
