RE: Possible system call interface for LSM

Previous message: Lachlan McIlroy: "RE: Possible system call interface for LSM"
In reply to: Lachlan McIlroy: "RE: Possible system call interface for LSM"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Possible system call interface for LSM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

offerat_private

* frm lachlanat_private "08/10/01 11:33:08 +1000" | sed '1,$s/^/* /'
*
*> -----Original Message-----
*> From: linux-security-module-adminat_private
*> [mailto:linux-security-module-adminat_private]On Behalf Of Seth Arnold
*> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 3:59 AM
*> To: linux-security-moduleat_private
*> Subject: Re: Possible system call interface for LSM
*> 
*> 
*> What happens when *length is less than zero?
* Good point.  It would be trivial to check for that case
* and while we're at it we could consider an upper bound
* on the length.

Making it a size_t rather than a int should solve the less-than-zero issue.

* Lachlan McIlroy                    Phone: +61 3 9596 4155

richard.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Offer                     Technical Lead, Trust Technology, SGI
"Specialization is for insects"
_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module