Re: Support for IPSOs

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 13:12:20 PDT

  • Next message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: Possible system call interface for LSM"

    On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:05:52PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
    > On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Greg KH wrote:
    > 
    > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 01:43:38PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
    > > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > None that I can see, maybe I can preserve the original
    > > > > behaviour when there is no LSM installed.
    > > >
    > > > Further to my previous email, the original behaviour can also be preserved
    > > > by leaving the hook where it is in your patch, and adding a
    > > > capable(CAP_NET_RAW) call in the dummy LSM module for this hook.
    > >
    > > Much like this does?
    > >
    > 
    > Yep.
    
    Thanks, commited.  (and then fixed typos by richard :)
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 13:14:37 PDT