Re: Support for IPSOs

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Possible system call interface for LSM"
In reply to: James Morris: "Re: Support for IPSOs"
Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: Support for IPSOs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:05:52PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 01:43:38PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > >
> > > > None that I can see, maybe I can preserve the original
> > > > behaviour when there is no LSM installed.
> > >
> > > Further to my previous email, the original behaviour can also be preserved
> > > by leaving the hook where it is in your patch, and adding a
> > > capable(CAP_NET_RAW) call in the dummy LSM module for this hook.
> >
> > Much like this does?
> >
> 
> Yep.

Thanks, commited.  (and then fixed typos by richard :)

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module