On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:43:27PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > Thanks, but the latest patch on lsm.immunix.org is against 2.4.8, which > existed for less time than other concerns allowed me to "capture". > > To reword my request, could we get a patch against 2.4.9? Just for > "hahas"? Or, if there's an hour or two delay, against the head of the > current stable linux release at www.kernel.org? (sorry, I get frustrated > by how fast the kernel people upgrade, but following LSM makes it even > more frustrating.) Wow, 2.4.9 has been out for what, 2 hours? I've had the merge checked in for what 1 hour? Can't you wait a bit for me to generate the patch? :) I do want to try to test the thing... > The head of the list is a wonderful place, but not accessable to me (not > going there.) I *do* have access to the most recent kernel release, and > if a patch against that could be made "standard", it would help > considerably. What do you mean "standard". Is the current patch situation not working for you? If you're subscribed to the lsm-commit mailing list, all the different commits get sent there as patches so you can keep your tree up to date without having to use bitkeeper. Isn't that enough? And I thought we said we wouldn't be releasing patches against the -pre kernels unless something warrants it. So forward porting for every -pre release would be a lot more work than other people were willing to put up with. Is that a problem? greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 15:56:30 PDT