On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:31:35PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote: > > wtf? > > > > /me goes screaming out of the room > > ????? I guess I'm missing something. A clue please? I think what Greg is getting at is that your last email asked for patches to be updated and released every time a new kernel is released, every time anyone proposes any new hooks, modifies hooks, removes hooks, in addition to every Friday. That is a serious amount of time spent generating patches -- time that could be better spent making forward progress rather than simple data conversions from one format to another -- because, indeed, there are currently three different methods for getting LSM data -- following the commits, following bitkeeper, and the occasional patches usually put together when Linus releases a new kernel or a large amount of LSM work has been performed. I think Greg just doesn't understand the need for Yet Another Method of following LSM progress. And I think I have to agree with his postulated position. Cheers _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 16:46:31 PDT