Re: syscall convention

Previous message: David Wheeler: "syscall convention"
In reply to: David Wheeler: "syscall convention"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: syscall convention"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: syscall convention"
Reply: jmjonesat_private: "Re: syscall convention"
Reply: richard offer: "Re: syscall convention"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: syscall convention"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:36:47PM -0400, David Wheeler wrote:
> This approach has the following advantages:
> * It's simple.

Great.  This is just one way to do this.  Feel free to create a stacking
module that does something like this.

However we are not forcing anyone to support this within the current lsm
patch.  So the current lsm syscall interface will stay the same as it
currently is (which does allow you to do this if you so desire).

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module