Re: syscall convention

From: Seth Arnold (sarnoldat_private)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 15:24:35 PDT

  • Next message: richard offer: "Re: syscall convention"

    On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 06:17:39PM -0400, jmjonesat_private wrote:
    > Hrm, I'd thought that a 32-bit identifier argument was something of a
    > "done deal" [...]
    
    Heh, and I similarly thought that leaving this entirely up to the
    modules in question (as opposed to an LSM-imposed convention) was a
    done deal.
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 15:25:59 PDT