Re: syscall convention

Previous message: richard offer: "Re: syscall convention"
In reply to: richard offer: "Re: syscall convention"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: syscall convention"
Next in thread: jmjonesat_private: "Re: syscall convention"
Reply: jmjonesat_private: "Re: syscall convention"
Reply: richard offer: "Re: syscall convention"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* richard offer (offerat_private) wrote:
> 
> 
> * frm offerat_private "08/21/01 15:27:23 -0700" | sed '1,$s/^/* /'
> *
> * 
>  
> * I will submit a patch that adds an extra parameter to syscall 
> * 
> *     sys_security(int modid, int cmd, unsigned long *args) 
> * 
> * for the private use of the module.
> 
> 
> Attached is the proposal (against ChangeSetat_private, 2001-08-21
> 11:34:20-04:00 by Stephen)
> 
> The prototype is now
> 
>     int sys_security(unsigned int modid, unsigned int call, unsigned long
> *args);

you forgot to actually change the implementation of the sys_security
syscall. (note: there is still signed/unsigned mismatch).

-chris