Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill

Previous message: David Wheeler: "Re: syscall convention"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jmorrisat_private

On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Stephen Smalley wrote:

>
> Ok.  Barring objections from others, I'll plan on committing the
> netlink patch tomorrow.
>

Yep, looks like a good solution.  I'm just wondering (not sure if it
really matters) why we wouldn't create a new netlink_security_ops
structure for these hooks though.

- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorrisat_private>

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module