Re: syscall convention

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 12:31:56 PDT

  • Next message: Gary E. Miller: "HP gets in to the Secure Linux biz"

    On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:27:29AM -0400, David Wheeler wrote:
    > Stephen Smalley wrote:
    > >I again asked for an additional integer parameter in the sys_security
    > >interface and syscall hook that could (optionally) be used by the module
    > >for the purpose of module identification....
    > >To my surprise, WireX seemed ok with the idea, and everyone else seemed
    > >to want it.  But you weren't there, so feel free to chime in now.
    > 
    > I _was_ at the BOF, and I can confirm that the attendees there _did_
    > agree that that this was fine.  Greg, sorry you weren't there!
    
    Yes, I forgot that this was mentioned at the end of Crispin's summary.
    So if everyone else wants the extra field, and we aren't imposing a
    required registration procedure, then Chris's last patch looks good.
    
    thanks,
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Aug 22 2001 - 12:33:40 PDT