Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Next in thread: Seth Arnold: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Reply: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:37:23AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> 
> From WireX and Greg K-H, we need to know whether even this patch
> acceptable, and, if not, is there some subset of this patch that
> would be acceptable?

Personally I don't like it.  It allows a module to modify the original
logic that is in the kernel too easily.  For right now I think we should
avoid doing this.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module