Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill

Previous message: Seth Arnold: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Capability tests in netlink and oom_kill"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:37:51AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > 
> > It doesn't really matter to me.  Does anyone else care?
> 
> I don't care.  Group hooks into sub structures where it makes logical
> sense.
> 
> Remember that the odds that the whole structure will be flattened to 1
> level deep to avoid more than 1 pointer dereference in the final version
> is still very high :)

I agree.  The only value of grouping is to help "make it as abstract
as possible and no abstracter" [irc somewhere on the web].  ;-)

-chris

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module