Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 10:47:07 PDT

  • Next message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: [PATCH] Authoritative hooks"

    On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:42:05 EDT, jmjonesat_private said:
    
    > I don't know if I agree with the "dubious nature" of a Phase 2 or not.
    > LSM is something fairly new, and very often the first pass reveals a slew
    > of things that can be done better with a second pass at it.  I do agree
    > that planning one out now isn't a particularly useful concept... if we can 
    > envision something that will "definitely be needed in phase 2", we
    > probably should accomodate it now... then let phase 2 design itself based
    > on the experience gained from phase 1. 
    
    Just beware the second-system effect (Fred Brooks, "Mythical Man-Month").
    
    Also, "Be prepared to throw the first one away".
    
    Too bad both are so hard to do at once. ;)
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 10:48:47 PDT