* Casey Schaufler (caseyat_private) wrote: > Chris Wright wrote: > > > from my take of monitoring their project we would use their work (and > > augment lsm accordingly), rather than them using our work. > > Now that's just silly, isn't it? Wouldn't it make most sense to > have one solution for everyone? LSM ought to work for POSIX > ACLs (NFSv4 pseudo NT ACLs, too) and we'll be failing in our > Linus Given Mission if they aren't part of the project. sorry, i was really thinking of the EA part of the EA/ACL project. so, specifically, as a seteattr/getettar interface stabilizes, we will support it in lsm. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 05 2001 - 16:47:28 PDT