Re: quotactl hook

Previous message: richard offer: "Re: quotactl hook"
In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: quotactl hook"
Next in thread: Casey Schaufler: "Re: quotactl hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

dawat_private

Seth Arnold  wrote:
>This won't work for any cases where there exists some kernel logic, a
>restrictive hook, but no capable() call.

Yeah.  I don't know of any such cases.  I thought the result of the
discussion with SGI was that they were going to look in detail to see
if there is any reason Smalley's approach wouldn't work.  Is that right?

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module