Re: Common header for security blobs

From: David Wagner (dawat_private)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 09:42:51 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "[PATCH] Clear security fields for inodes and System V IPC objects"

    Stephen Smalley  wrote:
    >IMHO, if we really want to support easy stacking of multiple modules,
    >then we do need such a common header [...]
    
    I guess the're also another way to support stacking: use a multiplexing
    module that does all the bookkeeping and dispatching of events to the
    real policy modules.  This would obviate the need for headers in the
    security blob, at the cost of introducing another module.  Right?
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 06 2001 - 10:18:44 PDT