Re: [PATCH] security.h documentation

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2001 - 13:34:44 PDT

  • Next message: richard offer: "RE: quotactl hook"

    On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:31:32PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
    > 
    > One other question related to the super_block and mount-related
    > hooks - should we move all of these hooks into a single substructure
    > since they are all closely related, even though they use different
    > structures (super_block vs. vfsmount)?
    
    That sounds good.  It makes sense.  I'd like to see more hooks move out
    of the big security_operations structure as it is (only to see
    everything jump back in at the very end...)
    
    thanks,
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 10 2001 - 13:37:28 PDT