On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 05:32:12PM -0700, richard offer wrote: > > Greg, obviously you're more up on kernel development than I am, can you > give me a hint. Or was it just a general warning "there have been issues > with this code in the past, be very careful about changing any logic". 2.4 had the same ptrace problems that 2.2 did, but they showed up a bit differently. And it's mostly a general warning, that rmc() call is there for a reason, which scares me that we are changing things around it. But that holds true for the lsm patch logic there in general :) That is one place that will _really_ need a good look over by people who understand all of the race conditions that are possible at that moment in time. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 10 2001 - 19:07:35 PDT