Re: [PATCH] security.h updates

From: James Morris (jmorrisat_private)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2001 - 17:18:11 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] security.h updates"

    On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Chris Wright wrote:
    > i've already got started one, see attached.  (it includes the documentation
    > changes).  and i don't believe we need to allocate for the copy cases.
    > the copy cases happen after a call to skb_alloc.  the clone case happens
    > after only a skb_head_from_pool/kmem_cache_alloc allocation (which, of
    > course doesn't call our skb_ops->alloc hook).
    > what do you think?
    That looks fine to me.
    - James
    James Morris
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 13 2001 - 17:20:08 PDT